Editorial methodology

A clear signal, not a blind promise

Every listing compresses the most useful checks into one row: payment status, closure state, risk signal, offer information, and the date of the last manual review.

Green · Healthy

No major warning was identified during the last manual review. This is a positive editorial snapshot, not a guarantee that every user will be paid or have the same experience.

Yellow · Use caution

Information may be mixed, incomplete, newly submitted, region-dependent, or not recently verified. Research the website and test with minimal exposure first.

Red · High risk

A serious concern was identified, such as strong scam indicators, persistent non-payment reports, inaccessible service, or another material warning. The visit button may remain for reference unless the site is closed.

What reviewers should check

  1. 01
    Availability

    Confirm the main website opens, core pages work, and the service is not clearly discontinued.

  2. 02
    Payment evidence

    Review current payout terms, minimum thresholds, supported methods, and credible recent reports.

  3. 03
    Risk indicators

    Look for deceptive claims, copied identity, malware warnings, impossible promises, withheld withdrawals, or unclear ownership.

  4. 04
    Offer accuracy

    Verify bonus terms, promo codes, wagering or withdrawal restrictions, and expiry information before publishing.

  5. 05
    Freshness

    Record a verification date. The interface marks listings as due for recheck after 90 days.

Submit